Friday, June 25, 2010

LASER ACUPUNCTURE

Principles of Low Intensity Laser Therapy (LILT)
DR VAMAN MD FASLMS PGAc (HARVARD)
Low Intensity Laser Therapy (LILT) involves the application of photon energy to the tissues with the object of augmentation of healing and/or the relief of pain.

PRINCIPLES OF USE:
1) The usual wavelengths are these which penetrate most deeply due to low absorption in the principal constituent in soft tissue namely water. Typical of these are:
a) Gallium Aluminum Arsenide at around 820nm (0.82 microns) which is maximally penetrative. This modality is the most important one for treatment of pain but is also effective in healing, reaching well into connective tissue corium. Absorbed by cell wall chromophores.
b) Visible Red at 633nm (0.633 microns) Helium Neon or 660nm (0.66 microns) Diode. These wavelengths have a propensity for healing particularly epithelial tissue and for laser acupuncture. Absorbed by mitochondrial cytochromes.
2) Dosimetry is all important in determining effect and in reporting a treatment episode. It is necessary to specify:

a) Wavelength e.g.820nm

b) Incident Power of Probe e.g.200mw (a good all around value)

c) Energy Per Point e.g. 10-20 joules for myofascial pain or 2-4 joules for healing of an intractable ulcer. A 60 milliwatt probe generates 4 joules in one minute for example.

d) Energy Density (”radiant exposure” or “fluence rate”) this can be calculated easily by knowing the area of the beam spot and multiplying this as a fraction of a square centimeter by the energy per point e.g. energy per point of 4 joules with the spot which is an eight of a square centimeter will result in an energy density of 4X8=32 joules per square centimeter. It should be emphasized that this is a convention which does not exactly represent the way in which photic energy is scattered in tissue as revealed by CCD camera.

A formula for more formal calculation of energy density is:
Energy density (J/CM2)= Power (w)X time (s) area(cm2)of spot

- Where the power of the probe is in milliwatts divide by 1000 to convert to watts in the formula.

e) Power Density (or “irradiance” or “fluence”)

A formula for calculation of power density (w/cm2) =Power(w)

area (cm2) of spot

This can be converted to milliwatts per square centimeter by multiplying by 1000.

f) Pulsing Characteristics and Duty Cycle Declare whether constant wave or pulsed.

g) Time of Treatment This is helpful to determine rate of energy application.

3) Mechanisms of Action may be summarized as:

a) Energization of Depleted Enzymes Enzymes may be denatured or depleted in areas of inflammation by hypoxia and acidosis. Important examples are:
1) Sodium Potassium ATPASE: Vital for nerve polarisation in transmission of an action potential. Low energies (less than around 4 joules per sq.cm. at the site) tend to increase concentrations and are logical for use in nerve regeneration e.g. in facial paralysis. High energies (more than around 4 joules per sq.cm. at site) tend to decrease concentrations being indicated for pain where the object is stabilization of sensitized pain fibres-nonmyelinated C fibres for slow dull pain and lightly myelinated A delta fibres for rapid sharp pain. This is the so-called Arndt Schultz response where low energies stimulate and high energies suppress.
2) Superoxide Dysmutase (SOD). This enzyme breaks down free radicals which are a cause of pain in trigger areas in muscle in myofascial pain.
3) Transforming Growth Factor Beta Fractions. Energization will help repair and heal. There are several fractions.

b) Vascular Effects

There is no doubt that laser energy is capable of initiating new vessel formation (angiogenesis) which is an important factor in healing e.g. with soft tissue flaps. It is often suggested that LILT causes an immediate augmentation of blood flow but there is no objective evidence of this unless energies are above normal therapeutic values sufficient to cause local healing (more than 150 joules per sq.cm).

c) Immune Augmentation
It seems likely that LILT can augment local and systemic immune mechanisms particularly if these are below par. Experience with irradiation of the blood has revealed a balancing effect where low rheology values are raised and high ones brought to normal values suggesting an important role for light in homeostasis.

d) Cellular Energization
Most cells after LILT demonstrate accumulation of energy molecules in the form of ATP.
e) Overall Effect Overall, the laser energy shortens the inflammatory phase after tissue injury hastening repair and remodeling.

4) Models of Usage

a) Local application to Nociceptive Foci. e.g. trigger points in muscle. Usually constant wave, adequate power rating for penetration and positive pressure to milk out excessive tissue fluid aiding penetration.

b) Entrainment of Bioresonances LILT in pulsed mode may be geared to correspond with central bioresonances. Various frequencies are suggested (Sisken & Walker) e.g.
2Hz Nerve regeneration, neurite outgrowth
7Hz Bone growth
10Hz Ligamentous healing
15, 20, 72, Hz Decreased skin necrosis, stimulation of capillary formation and fibroblast proliferation.
c) Ligamentous Healing Low energy
d) Nerve Regeneration
e) Laser Acupuncture Over acupuncture points or known nerve outflows. These points are highly reactive responding to low energies.

f) Component of Multi-Modality Treatment Regimens When treating pain the use of several methods each working through a different substantiated mechanism are more likely to be successful then single methods (Melzak & Wall). e.g.

1) May be combined with medication such as anticonvulsant and antidepressants in chronic pain thereby reducing dosage. Cortisone steroid however may negate LILT’s immune enhancement.
2) May be used with other forms of energy medicine e.g
Ultrasound
Short Wave Diathermy
Interferential Treatment
Acupuncture
Action Molecules (homeopathy)

g) Energization of Photodynamic Agents e.g. Toluidene Blue for bacterial reduction. This is an innovative which is in the experimental stage at the moment but which is likely to be increasingly important in the future in view of increasing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics.

TEXTBOOKS
Therapeutic Lasers Theory & Practice
G. David Baxter Churchill Livingstone 1994
SBN-0-443-04393-0

Energy Medicine The Scientific Basis
James L. Oschman. Churchhill Livingstone 2000
ISBN 0-443-06261-7

Low Level Laser Therapy as a Medical Treatment Entity
Pekka Pontinen Art Urpo Ltd 1992
ISBN 951-96632-0-7.

Lasers in Medicine and Dentistry: Low Intensity Laser Therapy
Editor: Z Simunovic. Vitagraf 2000
ISBN 953-6059-30-4

Low Level Laser Therapy Clinical Practice & Scientific Background
Jan Tuner & Lars Hode
Prima Books 1999. ISBN 91-630-7616-0

Teaching Module Abstract presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the North American Association for Laser Therapy (NAALT), Uniformed Services University for the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, April 4, 2003. www.naalt.org

Paul F. Bradley, M.D., D.D.S, M.S. Professor and Chairman, Oral Diagnostic Sciences. Director Head and Neck Pain, Nova Southeastern University, College of Dental Medicine. Health Professions Division 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328-2018

LANCET: Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain
Written by Vaman J N [Stream:Ayurveda]
Thursday, 11th March 2010
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials

Original Text

Dr Roberta T Chow MBBS a Corresponding AuthorEmail Address, Prof Mark I Johnson PhD b, Prof Rodrigo AB Lopes-Martins PhD c, Prof Jan M Bjordal PT d e
Summary
Background
Neck pain is a common and costly condition for which pharmacological management has limited evidence of efficacy and side-effects. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a relatively uncommon, non-invasive treatment for neck pain, in which non-thermal laser irradiation is applied to sites of pain. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to assess the efficacy of LLLT in neck pain.

Methods
We searched computerised databases comparing efficacy of LLLT using any wavelength with placebo or with active control in acute or chronic neck pain. Effect size for the primary outcome, pain intensity, was defined as a pooled estimate of mean difference in change in mm on 100 mm visual analogue scale.

Findings
We identified 16 randomised controlled trials including a total of 820 patients. In acute neck pain, results of two trials showed a relative risk (RR) of 1·69 (95% CI 1·22—2·33) for pain improvement of LLLT versus placebo. Five trials of chronic neck pain reporting categorical data showed an RR for pain improvement of 4·05 (2·74—5·98) of LLLT. Patients in 11 trials reporting changes in visual analogue scale had pain intensity reduced by 19·86 mm (10·04—29·68). Seven trials provided follow-up data for 1—22 weeks after completion of treatment, with short-term pain relief persisting in the medium term with a reduction of 22·07 mm (17·42—26·72). Side-effects from LLLT were mild and not different from those of placebo.

Interpretation
We show that LLLT reduces pain immediately after treatment in acute neck pain and up to 22 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with chronic neck pain.

________________________________

a Nerve Research Foundation, Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
b Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
c Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Pharmacology Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
d Faculty of Health and Social Science, Institute of Physiotherapy, Bergen University College, Bergen, Norway
e Section of Physiotherapy Science, Institute of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Corresponding Author Information Correspondence to: Dr Roberta T Chow, Honorary Research Associate, Nerve Research Foundation, Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, 100 Mallett Street, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2809%2961522-1/fulltext